Thursday, September 9, 2010

My undergrad degree is in broadcast communication.

I remember well my very first day of my very first broadcasting class, and the very first lesson from my very first communication professor. She shared the story of a small local newsroom in the southern US (if memory serves). A call came in one day from a man who planned to go to the town square, soak himself in gasoline and set himself on fire in protest (of what, I can't recall). 

A reporter and videographer went to the scene at the appointed time, and there was the man with his gas can. As the cameras rolled, he set himself on fire. Horrible.

The question was called to all of us media-wannabe neophytes: Were the reporter and videographer culpable in the mentally unstable protester's death? Had he set himself on fire because they were there?

I watched video yesterday of a Gainesville newspaper reporter being kicked off the property of that stupid church where they're threatening to burn the Koran (yes, I know the name of the stupid church and its stupid pastor, but they've gained more than enough publicity already). The intent of the video was to show how unfairly the church was treating one reporter because his paper had published an unflattering story, but I was taken with how many satellite trucks and eager observers were present. That first lesson from class at Brockport State came to mind.

Remove 24-7 HD coverage from the picture and one less bloated, self-important jackass can send shock waves around the world. Remove 24-7 HD coverage from the picture and the terrorists lose most of their sting. 

It is far past time for someone to report on the media's ever-expanding role in creating the news they then report.Depth and nuance are lost, but more and more air time is filled, nonetheless. Nothing attracts a crowd like a crowd. Lately when I turn on the news, I feel like a rubber-necker at a car wreck. PRURIENT is the word that comes to mind (marked by or arousing an immoderate or unwholesome interest or desire). 

I have this fantasy that all of the reporters and satellite trucks will leave Gainesville before Saturday night, and that idiot pastor will find himself alone with the crickets when he steps out on the church lawn to build his shameful fire. (I have another fantasy that he'll start a grass fire that burns his church to the ground, but I try not to dwell on that one.)

There is no solution -- probably not even a cogent point -- to all of this. But all of those people who send in videos of family members getting whacked in the gonads, hoping to win $100,000? I think several of them are now news directors at cable news channels around the world.


The difference between that pastor and his namesake pictured above? One of them is perversely doing whatever it takes to gain attention. The other one is an excellent comedic actor.




3 comments:

  1. I agree that the omnipresent media blows things like this up, and makes them more dangerous. But I go one step further--and think that we, as consumers of media, bear a lot of the blame for this.

    I have friends who complain about the horrible behavior of the "Housewives of New Jersey"--but they keep watching it. As long as people will watch, they'll keep showing it--and the more outrageous the behavoir, the better.

    Unfortunately, much of our "news" coverage mirrors that kind of thinking. The more outrageous, the better. And if I am NOT covering the book-burning on my news show this week, while the other networks are, I'll lose my viewers--so I HAVE to show it. So we always slither down toward the lowest common denominator.

    Producers package and promote prurient material because they think we want to watch/consume it. And where do they get that idea?

    How can we "be the change we want to see" in this piece of our world? Maybe all of us start with the exhortation in Philippians 4:9 --

    "Whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasing, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence and if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Our human brain: organic comput par excellence.

    Worn and weary computer programmer phrase:
    "Garbage in, garbage out."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I left out the "er". It wasn't in the budget this quarter.

    ReplyDelete