Friday, May 13, 2011

Rugged Communalists Unite!

So, if they say to you, “Look! He is in the wilderness”, do not go out. If they say, “Look! He is in the inner rooms”, do not believe it. -- Matthew 24:26


Call it a preview of Sunday's sermon, I'm focusing a lot these days on the tension between individual and communal impulses in our world and, especially, our religions.

It all started with NPR, of course. The world would be a much better place if we all spent half an hour or so every day digging through their various reports and wild hairs. Here's what got me started:



This is Harold Camping, an 89 year-old preacher who – since the world didn’t end on September 6, 1994, as he originally predicted – has come to the irrefutable conclusion that a series of devastating earthquakes will spell rapture and the end of the world on May 21 at 6 p.m… That’s right, one week from Saturday, as I write this. Be sure and make it an early dinner that night.


Harold has ambled along in this belief for some time, broadcasting it on his Family Radio program. It has led a handful of folks to quit their jobs, cash in their 401(k)s, get divorced from sceptical spouses (ya think?!?), and take to the streets to hand out tracts and preach the rapture to all who would hear.

You and I know there have been plenty of doomsday-ers through the millennia. Fervent crackpots, we consider them. Some are harmless, others much worse. But each of them must be at least somewhat aware of the poor track record of End-of-the-World types (even Jesus is quoted as saying HE hadn’t a clue when it would happen – and that’s the Gospel truth).

But here’s the thing: At some point in the next million years or so, one of these guys and gals is going to trip into perfect timing: the asteroid will hit, the sun will go szzztz, the earth will crack like an egg, or some other random or human-instigated calamity will send us off our orbit, and, just before our vital organs and/or bionic/android parts are vaporized in the cold, dark vacuum of space, that individual may have just enough time to cap human history with the mother of all I-told-you-so’s. Apparently this dark cosmic lottery is an attractive possibility for would-be prophets of destruction. They’re willing to go waaaay out on that limb by themselves and then call a few gullible fools out there with them, each of whom also burns with a need to be right in some spectacular way nobody else can match. This story brought alternating chuckles and groans. I just pray Mr. Camping isn’t next to me saying “I told you so” a week from Saturday just before I go szzztz in the yawning vacuum of space.

So then I check the NPR sidebar and find this story:



The story is all about a plant found in Africa in 1895, a male cutting of which was carried to London, where it sat inside for 98 years, only to wake up and find it had been out of circulation for so long, there were no female plants left to date. They believe this one male plant, which dutifully produces pollen and frequents singles’ garden happy hours, is all that is left of E. Woodii. It can be cloned, but only to produce more males, and no female counterpart has been found (and, yes, the article does mention the Ents’ dilemma from Lord of the Rings, so let’s not breathe another Tolkienian word about it… as I am trying to maintain the illusion that I am only a partial dork.)


You can’t help but feel sorry for this guy. He’s out there all alone, with little to no hope of ever settling down with a little Mrs. E. Woodii.  Truly, nobody wants to be that isolated, that special.

I believe it was God – talking to only-God-knows-Who – who said “it is not good that man should be alone.” And who would know better, as we were dreamed up by the Holy One as a solution to Her own solitary non-confinement? We are meant to come together, not break apart.

We are built of the stuff just laying around, fed starlight in one form or another, taught to embrace and apply all the best thoughts thought up so far, and basically tool about the planet that claims us as one of its many little 80-year migratory pimples. The thought of any of us being an individual is rather jaw-dropping, when framed in such a manner.

So, from now on I am going to strive to be a Rugged Communalist. I want to recognize more clearly that I am the product of so much borrowed heat and light. I don’t want to distance myself from the competition, a la Harold Camping. Heck, I don’t want to experience competition in such things. I’d rather just throw it all in the God box, hang on to my wife/kids/friends/job/community/world/semi-sanity, strive to DO right over BE right, and pray never to become the faith equivalent of E. Woodii.

12 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry the post got wiped out...Blogger's fault. Took out Kristin's cogent comments, too. Sure sign of the coming apocalypse, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Have no fear, Kristin's smart phone remembered what she said!

    Yeah, way too many irreverent jokes with this one. I am curious though, if you fervently believe the world will end, why continue to produce children? Or operate a health and wellness store? ( false hope)? I mean really if knew for certain that all I was going to put in was 39 years, I would just eat the cheeseburger and order the second helping of fries. Screw the granola, and vegetarianism! And I remain truly suspect of anyone who is about spirituality for sale. I mean don't you have to wonder why brother man was racking in 100 million on his radio show? What was he hoping to do, purchase the pearly gates? I guess I'm with Rabbi Kushner, when he says, "I think that it is supreme hubris to think you can read God's mind." 6 pm huh? I see a really tall mojito in my future. I'll either be raising my glass with and saying L'chiam! Or wondering if anyone else heard that szzzzztz.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Did anyone see the picture of the controversial billboard that was recently put up by another spiritual group near Family Radio’s headquarters? It directly challenges them about May 21. Here is a picture of it:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/62779138@N08/5708063636

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did anyone see the picture of the controversial billboard that was recently put up by another spiritual group near Family Radio’s headquarters? It directly challenges them about May 21. Here is a picture of it:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/62779138@N08/5708063636

    ReplyDelete
  7. I find it ironic that we pick on these folks, but revere Jesus, even though it's well known that he was an apocalyptic prophet in his time. So - are these "nuts" not as nutty as we think, or was Jesus just another nut??

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hmm, Erin. Can't agree with you here, but that's what this blog is all about.

    Personally, I wouldn't put Harold Camping and his ilk in the same prophetic category with Christ. Very few of the preserved statements of Jesus deal with the end of the world, and certainly none of them pin-pointed a date of his return. He also clearly, repeatedly steered his followers away from such a mindset. He spent almost all of his breath preaching love of God, embrace of the vulnerable, justice and community... i.e. DOING something to ease the suffering of others to bring closer the Kingdom of God.

    That being the case, the answer to the question(s) you pose would be, for me, a simple, all encompassing no: No, many dooms-dayers ARE every bit as nutty as we think, and, no, Jesus was not just another nut.

    I've never considered it a very good strategy to try to frighten someone into love, and isn't it love to which Christ continually calls us? That's why I accept folks like Harold Camping like I accept an eccentric uncle: Save his spot at the table and hear him out, but don't hand him the microphone at the wedding reception. (1 Thessalonians 5:19-22 comes to mind: Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise the words of prophets, but test everything; hold fast to what is good; abstain from every form of evil.)

    Then there's the wreckage to come on May 22nd, when Harold Camp's followers will most likely wake to find they have broken their families, squandered their resources, lost their homes and wasted their energy in embrace of a LIE. If the world does not end on May 21st, who exactly will Harold Camping have brought closer to Christ with his "iron-clad, Bible-guaranteed" prediction? And, beyond that, what do we make of his insistence that all "true believers" should remove themselves entirely from their faith communities and heed only Camping's teachings?

    Sorry, but I believe picking on this man's wild teachings is a great way to revere Jesus!

    What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Glad you didn't excommunicate me for that comment ;)

    Honestly, though, many many many biblical scholars, including most notably Bart Ehrman, posit that Jesus believed the end of the world would occur within the lifetime of those around him. There are many documented verses where he hints at the coming doomsday, including Matthew 4:17; Matthew 24:34; Mark 1:15; Mark 9:1; and Mark 13:30. So clearly he was asserting that the end of the world was very near. There are even very compelling arguments that future apostles (or those posing as apostles) had to change the scriptures to save face for the fact that the world did not end during Jesus' time.

    Here's an interesting discussion:
    "Jesus was an apocalyptic Jew from the first century who fervently believed that the world was about to end over nineteen centuries ago. Whilst he frequently debated how to interpret the Jewish Law, he fervently believed that it was to be followed until Heaven and Earth disappeared. Whilst he is generally regarded as a great moral teacher and a motivated advocate of spiritual capitalism, it is clear that not all of his preachments are fit for a twenty first century society, or family unit. Our opaque grasp of the historical Jesus is compounded by the fact, that the gospels have not established themselves as reliable sources under objective scrutiny. In addition, Jesus’ miracles which are often a replica of previous mythologies, definitely raise questions about where the authors drew their creative inspiration from."
    http://www.christianitydisproved.com/jesus.html

    I'm not arguing that Jesus mainly taught peace, goodness, tolerance, and other admirable lessons. I believe his teachings of love are applicable even today. But that doesn't change the fact that he still thought or at least proclaimed that the end of the world was imminent.

    Maybe "nut" wasn't the right word. And clearly many of today's apocalyptic prophets are not adhering to Jesus' other principles. But maybe we shouldn't be so quick to call them crazy?

    Just my thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Excommunicate you... yeah, right, Erin! Creative, independent use of the gray matter is roundly encouraged here!

    Point exceedingly well made and taken regarding caution in labeling anyone crazy. Thanks for that.

    I'd like to return to the conversation starters you raise, as they are very intriguing lines of reasoning. I haven't read Ehrman's work, but I'm familiar with the thought behind it.

    * I think a larger number of reputable scholars would attribute the anticipation of the imminent return of Christ to his followers, not to Jesus. Many suggest the scattershot references to end times showt not that editors and authors did a partial scrub job of Jesus' words, but that their own expectations were occasionally superimposed over his ministry. Seems a more responsible conjecture than Ehrman's. And it is not so clear to me that Jesus was asserting "the end was near" as we have come to understand such talk.

    * I think it is important to recognize apocalyptic literature for what it was and is. The Book of Daniel was an oppressed people's interpretation of the world as it was, conveyed in veiled, symbolic language that made sense to the oppressed, but confounded the oppressor. It is hard for us in the western world to get our minds around this concept, as we are the rich and powerful, but Jesus' use of imagery from such literature would get the right heads nodding without yanking Roman ears.

    Likewise, Revelation is primarily about the Roman Empire, not Russia or China or America or the future. Circa 70 CE Jerusalem was gutted, the Temple torn down to its western wall, the Jews scattered to the wind, the Christians sporadically persecuted and martyred, and what remained of the promise of The Promised Land dissolved. Didn't their world, in fact, come to an end? Then, with the co-opting of Christianity by Rome, didn't Christ, in some fashion, come on the clouds and conquer the mighty oppressors of his day?

    * What is Spiritual Capitalism? I am unfamiliar with the term. Does it refer to "winning souls." (?)

    * Regarding "previous mythologies," this always drives me a little nuts when used to discredit Hebrew and Christian scripture. First, if Alex Rodriguez strikes out in the bottom of the ninth with two out and runners on 2nd and 3rd, does he cease to exist? After all, we've all read Casey at the Bat...

    But more, we always refer to our mythos when describing our heroes and their actions. Most cultures do, as myth is a profound expression of shared truth and experience. "Myth," in any but the current popular vernacular, is not a term interchangeable with "fiction." The fact that the storytellers of the day couch their news in language and idioms that resonate with their listeners shows they were effective communicators. It does not disprove the miraculous nature of Jesus' ministry or Moses' leadership, etc., but bestows honor upon them. A good leader meets the people where they are and draws them toward where they need to be. Jesus was trying to turn an entire political, religious and cultural world. That necessitated entering into, embracing and re-focusing their mythos.

    * The Kingdom of God does not necessarily mean some apocalyptic event. Look how Jesus repeatedly uses the term to praise a wise answer or profound gesture. It suggests a revolutionary re-framing of Judaism and its proponents expectations, yes, but why by the writers and not Jesus himself? When so much of what he said and did turned the teachings of the day on their ear, why would we begin to suggest Jesus toed the party line regarding Messianic expectations?


    Again, I LOVE this conversation. I still deem Camping obtuse. By my count, such false prophets of the end times are approximately 0-for-999,754,723. Still, their stance is not without some sort of scriptural basis. I admit. But it represents pretty goofy interpretation.

    Great stuff!

    ReplyDelete
  11. So earlier today I stepped into a used book store in Downtown Burlington, and picked up this book of poetry by reg E. gaines, titled, the original buckwheat; turned to the first poem -christian haiku

    *clears throat*

    "if my name were christ i'd definitely think twice bout coming back here"

    I bought the book, and a box of gluten free, coconut cupcakes and smiled the whole way "home".

    ReplyDelete
  12. pow. Great share, Kristin! Great conversation, all. Thanks for popping in on this one...

    ReplyDelete