I highly recommend the use of headphones, as I MUMBLE a bit toward the end...
Run by the pastor of a Christian church for independent thinkers, this blog is all about interacting with each other and the world-at-large, discussing a variety of issues from any adventurous, intelligent, open-minded faith perspective. Please join in!
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Monday, November 12, 2012
Weed Theology
Alice |
Lola |
Here. Watch this YouTube video of someone else's guinea pig popcorning. Keep your eye on the little one:
Now THAT'S fun to watch! Keepers of guinea pigs get an instant reward for pleasing their pets. And what pleases Lola and Alice most?
Fresh dandelion greens.
And so, the noxious weed I have done all in my power to eradicate from my yard for decades has suddenly become a prized find. In fact, I have caught myself weeding grass out from around dandelions to ensure my guinea pigs would have a fresh supply. The once Round-Up deserving usurpers of my pure and holy lawn are suddenly a welcomed and honored guest.
Of course the local rabbits knew the value of dandelions long before I did. I imagine they sat in the bramble shaking their heads at how I used to poison, rip up, curse and fling away one of their favorite food sources, leaving them no choice but to decimate my much less flavorful garden lettuce instead.
I wonder what else in my life I have erroneously deemed useless only to stunt blessings and complicate matters. Who have I poisoned? What have I ripped up, cursed and flung away from me that might have proved valuable, even blessed to me or someone near me if not for my arrogant, ignorant prejudice?
We don't weed out our faith community for this very reason. There's a lot to be said for attracting and keeping all kinds of yahoos and misfits. Immediately, it makes for more varied and confounding coffee hour conversation. Even more, broader minds and wider viewpoints can help us to recognize good in what we too readily discount or disregard. An invitation to our church is an opportunity to fraternize with folks you'd otherwise probably not get to know, which, of course, is an opportunity to a life of greater depth, breadth, wisdom, and blessing. Consider yourself invited.
In the 4th chapter of Philippians Paul urges us to rejoice always in our faith, to show gentleness to everyone, to lay our worries down and let the peace of God rule our hearts and minds. He goes on to suggest we should seek to discern what is true, honorable, pure, pleasing, commendable excellent and praise-worthy in all around us. Since this directive falls within Paul's discussion of healing rifts between people, he is not suggesting we winnow out all that is imperfect. Rather, he is asserting a vein of Godliness might just run through us all if we'd only see "inconvenient" or "inconsequential" others (and ourselves) with new eyes.
This is what we strive to do at our church. It doesn't always make sense. Sometimes it's freaky. But, hey, we're more frontier than fortress.
And that, my friends, is Weed Theology.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Mrs. Jesus H. Christ
Perhaps you've seen the recent reports regarding Harvard University Christian history professor Dr. Karen King, and her unveiling of a tiny piece of 4th century Coptic papyrus which quotes Jesus speaking of his wife.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/19/us/historian-says-piece-of-papyrus-refers-to-jesus-wife.html
Now these sorts of things pop up from time to time, and who knows if what they document is actual fact, or even precisely what the term "wife" may have meant for a first or fourth century itinerant rabbi. Still, I find it intriguing to consider the possibility of a Mrs. Jesus, not just for the Dan Brown-eque messianic bloodline, but for the woman herself, and for Jesus' sake.
If you've never read Kazantzakis' brilliant, tender 1953 novel The Last Temptation of Christ, I can't recommend it enough. In it, Jesus on the cross has flashed before him what might have been had he married, settled down and raised a family instead of charging headlong into his ministry -- mounting bold, public opposition to the religious, social, and political leaders of his day, ultimately to a tortured death (well, not ultimately, but that's a story for another day...). Avoid the 1988 movie, which made a poorly acted and worse edited hash of it all. Check out that book!
I like the idea of Jesus having known wedded bliss, home and hearth. For example, I love the thought of his spouse serving a delicious meal and beaming with love and pride when he takes pleasure in it. I prefer the idea of the Son of Man having a place to lay his head. And, no, I have no problem with Jesus taking part in any other element of marriage. I have always cherished the fully human Christ. I relate to him best. I rely on him most.
I know some folks need a much higher christology. I don't begrudge that in the least. But for me, the greatest power of the greatest story ever told is that whole idea of the messiah pitching a tent among us as one of us: living in a real body in the real world. I acknowledge the "super"but gravitate to the "natural."
Maybe it comes down to my faith in humanity and myself. I've never managed it, but I believe here and there we could probably find people who come very close to living the ideal provided by Jesus. As I strive to move closer to him myself, it is some comfort to think of him showing up closer to me than expected, too.
What do you think about a Mrs. Jesus?
Draw near to God and God will draw near to you. -- James 4:8
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/19/us/historian-says-piece-of-papyrus-refers-to-jesus-wife.html
Now these sorts of things pop up from time to time, and who knows if what they document is actual fact, or even precisely what the term "wife" may have meant for a first or fourth century itinerant rabbi. Still, I find it intriguing to consider the possibility of a Mrs. Jesus, not just for the Dan Brown-eque messianic bloodline, but for the woman herself, and for Jesus' sake.
If you've never read Kazantzakis' brilliant, tender 1953 novel The Last Temptation of Christ, I can't recommend it enough. In it, Jesus on the cross has flashed before him what might have been had he married, settled down and raised a family instead of charging headlong into his ministry -- mounting bold, public opposition to the religious, social, and political leaders of his day, ultimately to a tortured death (well, not ultimately, but that's a story for another day...). Avoid the 1988 movie, which made a poorly acted and worse edited hash of it all. Check out that book!
I like the idea of Jesus having known wedded bliss, home and hearth. For example, I love the thought of his spouse serving a delicious meal and beaming with love and pride when he takes pleasure in it. I prefer the idea of the Son of Man having a place to lay his head. And, no, I have no problem with Jesus taking part in any other element of marriage. I have always cherished the fully human Christ. I relate to him best. I rely on him most.
I know some folks need a much higher christology. I don't begrudge that in the least. But for me, the greatest power of the greatest story ever told is that whole idea of the messiah pitching a tent among us as one of us: living in a real body in the real world. I acknowledge the "super"but gravitate to the "natural."
Maybe it comes down to my faith in humanity and myself. I've never managed it, but I believe here and there we could probably find people who come very close to living the ideal provided by Jesus. As I strive to move closer to him myself, it is some comfort to think of him showing up closer to me than expected, too.
What do you think about a Mrs. Jesus?
Draw near to God and God will draw near to you. -- James 4:8
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Religion and Science Meet for a Beer
Science says “Who’d’ve thought you’d meet me here.
Your wild-eyed followers scream ‘demon rum!’
They picket the pub and hatchet the drum.”
Religion just smiles and says “I thought you knew,
We both claim the guys who made the best brew.
My monks used your knowledge to perfect hops and yeast
And this glorious drink holds no ‘mark of the beast.’ ”
You don’t blame me and I won’t blame you.
People are people. They do what they do.
Blackpowder clears pathways for life-giving trains,
They use it for bullets to blow out their brains.
You give them fission and they build their bombs.
I give them Goddess, they bitch-slap their moms.
People are people. They do what they do.
You don’t blame me and I won’t blame you.
Religion and Science meet at the school.
Science says “hey, this is no place for you.
Your people deny what’s in front of their face
Shout down fact and theory, refute time and space.”
Religion concurs, “I know that is so,
But there’s still a bit more of that story to show.
Mohammedans once charted math and the stars.
Newton found Physics; Egyptian priests, Mars."
You don’t blame me and I won’t blame you.
People are people. They do what they do.
I give them new heights, they leap to their death,
You give them cold meds, they make crystal meth.
I lay down the law: ‘love all whom you meet,’
So they kill from a distance and don’t miss a beat.
People are people. They do what they do.
You don’t blame me and I won’t blame you.
Religion and Science meet at the church.
Religion is shocked, “you’re here at my perch?!?”
Science falls to its knees “I’ve had quite enough,
I can’t build a way to solve all this stuff!”
Religion cracks open a Psych 1-0-1 text,
“I was counting on you to save me from this mess!”
And there we must leave them: theory and oath.
Eliminate either: we die without both.
(C)2012 Corey Keyes
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Singing Pain
It is, like a rattlesnake rattle, designed to make
us recoil. The threat of pain will abruptly, even involuntarily change our
behavior. Everything inside of us screams that pain is to be avoided.
Not precisely so.
This morning's reflection was Psalm 137. It is,
perhaps, the single nastiest pericope in all of the Bible:
there
we sat down and there we wept
when we remembered
Zion.
On the willows there
we hung up our
harps.
For there our captors
asked us for songs,
and
our tormentors asked for mirth, saying,
‘Sing us one of the
songs of Zion!’
How could we sing the Lord’s
song
in a foreign land?
If I forget you,
O Jerusalem,
let my right hand wither!
Let my
tongue cling to the roof of my mouth,
if I do not remember
you,
if I do not set Jerusalem
above my highest joy.
Remember, O Lord, against the
Edomites
the day of Jerusalem’s fall,
how they said,
‘Tear it
down! Tear it down!
Down to its foundations!’
O daughter
Babylon, you devastator!
Happy shall they be who pay
you back
what you have done to us!
Happy shall
they be who take your little ones
and dash them against the
rock!
This song of pain was created by the
exiled tribes of Judah, who were invaded, conquered and transported across
hundreds of miles of wilderness to Babylon. All that they held dear was
unreachable. The temple where they gathered to encounter and worship their God
was now forcibly abandoned. All that had been home to them was less than a dot
on the far horizon, and they had no reason to believe they'd ever see it again.
In fact, the writers and initial singers of this song would never make it back
home. It was lost forever to them.
If you are unfortunate enough to be a
member of an oppressed group, this poem's despair, anger and violent cry for
vengeance no doubt resonate within you. If you are, like me, in the cushy
position of being a to-the-manor-born member of the dominant sub-group of the
richest, most powerful nation in human history, maybe not so much.
Why would anyone go out of their way
to even read this, let alone reflect on it? Because it is healthy to do so. It
is good medicine.
Pain is an alarm. When your arm
hurts, you look at it, touch it, focus on it. You find the problem and do what
you can to fix it. You get help as necessary. You cry out.
The loss of capacity to feel pain is
among the most dangerous of afflictions. If your backside is on fire, you
should want to know about it before irreversible damage results.
I'm sure you're with me so far.
Here's what's going to be on the test:
•
avoiding painful injury = healthy
•
ignoring pain = unhealthy
My mom is slipping quickly away into
the darkness of Alzheimer's Disease. Last week I dropped by for a quick
visit/errand to my parents on my way to other things. My kids waited in the
car, wishing to avoid a painful emotional injury. I went in to lay out their
pills for the week, and found myself alone at the table with my mother. She
asked innocently enough if I did this sort of thing for other people. I looked
up, smiled and said "no, just for the two of you." She smiled and
said "that's very nice of you," and, looking into her pretty vacant
eyes, I realized she clearly had no idea who I was. At that moment, all
that had once been home to me was less than a dot on the far horizon.
It hurt.
When I got back to the car, I took a
deep breath and told my kids about it. They said they were sorry it happened
and reflected how much that must have hurt. I said "eh, I'm okay."
They both just looked at me in
disbelieving silence. Dae reached out her hand and touched my arm and said
"you know, Dad, it's okay if you're not okay sometimes, too."
Damn.
My kids are probably the holiest agnostics
I know. The injury had already occurred. All I was doing was ignoring the
pain.
We all, each of us, find ourselves
exiled at one time or another in life. These days, when I say I love my mother,
to be honest, I am mostly confessing a longing for something not quite captured
in all those family photographs. I wish I still could be living what we were
experiencing when that Instamatic shutter clicked, not the flat, boxed-in
replicas that are nothing more than aging paper and decaying chemicals.
Most of what I really feel these days when I look at that hollowing shell
of a human being is pity and unanswerable longing. How can I sing her favorite
songs? This wicked disease has carried us away. This awful place is a decidedly
strange land.
And where shall I direct my anger? At
the inanimate and inanimating buildup of deadening proteins in the
channels of her brain? At a society that wastes billions a day on stupid wars
and partisan name-calling while many among us rot from the inside out? Rest
assured, if I ever learn that Alzheimer's is a result of exposure to some
carcinogen (say non-stick or aluminum cookware) and some shadowy
corporate/agency-"they" KNEW about it, I will most definitely be
looking for little ones to dash upon rocks!
We all, each of us, find ourselves
exiled at one time or another in life. Feel the pain. Follow it to its source.
Recognize the timeless wisdom that included the likes of Psalm 137 in our
Bibles. Once the pain has arrived, it is best to acknowledge it, explore it and
sing it out loud. Once that nasty rattlesnake has bitten, it's the only
way to remove the poison.
Call this my Psalm 137.
Will you sing yours?
(Each Wednesday morning from
7:30-7:50, I host a time of quiet reflection at our church sanctuary in West
Bloomfield. A psalm is read, the very briefest of words spoken, and then a time
of quiet reflection and meditation is opened. It is a new part of my own faith
discipline that I want to share with others. All are welcome. Psalm
137 was this morning's offering.)
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Q:Why did the chicken cross the road? A:Because it was free to do so.
I am a firm believer in marriage.
When I was growing up, I didn’t always agree with my father
and his choices, but the sterling central pillar of his character that I have
always unfailingly admired, even at the youngest of ages, was and is his fierce, undying
love for my mother.
It is, at times, clumsily applied, in my opinion. But underneath the bluster and frustration, NOBODY
can honestly question my father’s powerful devotion to my mother.
I hope my children can say the same for me. I love Teresa so
widely, narrowly, top to bottom and inside and out that it has consumed me, refined
me and defined me. I can’t imagine
life without her. Something wild, weird, delightful or terrible happens to me?
It is she with whom I first want to share the story as soon as possible. Even
better are the adventures we experience together, which we can call up to each
other with little more than a glance across a crowded room. I delight in those
times when she speaks what was just on the tip of my tongue, or when we don’t
have to speak at all. She hurts, I hurt. She feels joy, I soar, too. She advises, I
weigh her words carefully (okay, usually I object and stonewall, and then crawl
off to my cave to somehow convert her
clear thinking to my idea, but you
all know what I mean). I am a better, more complete and more fully realized
human being for her inexplicable decision to spend her life with mine, side by side and arm in arm, officially, personally, publicly and faithfully united.
I wish everyone who longed for such a relationship could
have it. I look for that potential in every couple I counsel for marriage. What is your strength together? What is that
go-to default setting between you that no crisis can touch? Identify it. Nurture it. Celebrate it. Guard it with your LIVES!
This is what I find so heart-breaking about the current
marriage rights debate. Some would try to turn this whole Chik-fil-A tempest
into some battle for free speech. Somehow, Dan Cathy’s right to say as he
pleases is threatened by the millions who recoil from his pronouncements and actions, and from the corporation he owns and the product he sells
to fund his political efforts?
Wait. Please.
One side in this battle is fighting for the right of
individuals to find and strive to fully live in the joy I have described above with the legal recognition of the state, and the full blessing and support of their faith communities.
The other side is trying to permanently legislate the state-enforced denial of
that pursuit of happiness for an entire sub-group of Americans, including
stepping between this pastor and members of his flock.
Being a citizen of “the land of the free and the home of the
brave” comes with certain responsibilities. Chief among them is to trust that
others can make their own way in the world without you or me forcing complete
personal public and private adherence to the particulars of our own world view. If what you want
for your life does not injure others, I have no grounds for preventing you
pursuing it, even if I find it repulsive or at odds with my morality.
If you or I object to gay marriage, we should neither
enter into one nor attend a church that performs such ceremonies. I don’t cry
foul to any of my friends, colleagues or relatives who disagree with gay marriage as long as they leave it at that. What
we should not do is
endeavor to influence elected officials to shut down another's equal protection and reasonable rights.
This is America, for God’s sake.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. -- The Establishment and Free Exercise clauses of the Constitution of the United States
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Time to Tick You Off, Sports Fans!
Okay. I'm going to speak frankly for many, MANY of my colleagues in ministry who are experiencing many of the same issues I see in my congregation and community. In the process, I am, no doubt, going to offend many people who I love very much.
Sorry, but here goes.
"We all have to remember that we can't let our love of the games get ahead of the core values, and we know that happens often. This is a painful, painful reminder that awful things can happen when that occurs."- MARK EMMERT, president of the N.C.A.A., announcing sanctions against Penn State University after the child sexual abuse scandal.
"Sports do not build character, they reveal it." - JOHN WOODEN, former coach, UCLA men's basketball (and quite possibly the best coach ever in any sport)
Saddened by the state of society and sport?
Take a look in the friggin' mirror.
Remember the Sabbath, and keep it holy. - Exodus 20:8
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Lust in the Dust... It's The Holy Bible!
Genesis Chapter 38 is an astoundingly trashy story regarding
one of the Judeo-Christian Patriarchs – Judah – and his widowed
daughter-in-law, Tamar (disguised as a prostitute), and how they came to have
sex and spawn the lineage that would one day include kings David and Solomon,
and, eventually, Joseph, husband of Mary, mother of Jesus.
You know, typical Biblical family values.
This story is timely, however, for what happens before Judah impregnates his
daughter-in-law.
Judah has three sons. The oldest, efficiently named Er, marries Tamar, but dies before any
children are born. Now, as is standard practice in traditional Biblical
marriage, Judah’s second son, Onan,
must impregnate his sister-in-law, so she can have (hopefully) a son to gain
claim to an inheritance and keep Er’s lineage going; also protecting Tamar, who, as a
woman, cannot own property or fend for herself in that ancient world. Again, traditional
Biblical family values.
Onan is powerfully attracted to Tamar, but sees that
providing offspring for his dead brother will only weaken his own holdings, so:
he spilled his semen on the ground
whenever he went in to his brother’s wife, so that he would not give offspring
to his brother. What he did was
displeasing in the sight of the Lord, and He put him to death…(Genesis
38:9-10, NRSV).
Now the rest of the story is well worth reading, but I’m
stopping here, as this is a root of a current kerfuffle in our nation: birth
control. I do not wish to argue about whether a corporation owned by a
religious institution can be forced to partially underwrite coverage/care that
is in direct opposition to the religious teachings of that corporation’s
owners. I would tend to tread veeeery carefully with such an issue. Instead,
I’d like to tweak a bit the “Biblical basis” some bandy about regarding this
particular conflict.
The Sin of Onan
One thing I love about the Bible is the fact that it refuses
to sugar-coat human behavior. Onan is a first-class jerk, taking advantage of a
woman’s dire predicament to slake his lust without offering her deliverance
from her troubles through impregnation – which is the justice principal
underlying the whole sordid tale. Onan, through his manipulation of the law for
his own gain, gets what he wants but leaves the woman as vulnerable as ever.
In December, 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission ruled that failure to cover contraceptives for women violated the
1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which was itself an amendment to Title VII
of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Now the Department of Health and Human Services
has ruled that birth control must be covered in most insurance policies without
additional cost (pleasepleaseplease note that this is not precisely the
same as “free” or “paid for by the church.”)
It can be argued persuasively that the relatively new-found
ability of women to plan when they will get pregnant makes them (and their children) less vulnerable in society: empowering them socially, culturally, politically and economically in ways
that Tamar, Onan, Judah and the writer of Genesis could never have imagined. Therefore, the modern “Sin of Onan” in this case may
not be denying the 21st century Tamar the right to a child, but,
ironically, insisting she pay extra beyond her already rising health insurance
premiums to determine when and with whom she will have that child.
I’m just saying.
Monday, March 26, 2012
Spending Time
The great French Marshall
Lyautey once asked his gardener to plant a tree. The gardener objected that the
tree was slow growing and would not reach maturity for 100 years. The Marshall
replied, 'In that case, there is no time to lose; plant it
this afternoon! –
John F. Kennedy
Way back
in a former life, an electric utility CEO once told me that he had just left a
meeting in which his board of directors had instantly approved spending
$10,000,000 on a new substation without batting an eye, then debated for an
hour before tabling a motion to expend $3,000 on a bit of office carpeting.
“Some
things seem too big to question,” he reasoned. “Instead, people object to
little things that cost next to nothing, but provide a convenient illusion of
control.”
I would
say the same flawed thinking holds true for spending time. According to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average 25-64 year old adult spends his/her life like so:
33% Sleep
24%
Full-time job
11.3%
Watching television
9% Other activities/self-care
8.3%
Household/family
5.2%
Eating
4.5%
Online
4.1%
Commuting
0.6%
Religious activities
It
is appropriate and healthy for us to sleep a third of our life away. It is hard
to escape spending a third of our lives pursuing a living. But surrendering 15.8% to staring at a screen?!? And, if 99.4% of
our precious time is spent elsewhere, why are our faith practices often first
to suffer when life gets hectic?
In
the early days of my ministry, I still worked full-time at a local advertising
agency. One day a co-worker approached me. He was in his early 30s. He and his
wife had young children. He put in a lot of hours at the office.
“I
was raised Christian,” he said to me, “and I do miss my church. But by the time
Sunday morning comes around, we’re too exhausted from our week to pack the kids
in the car and head off to worship. What can I do?”
This
was the first time I was ever asked this question. I’ve answered it a thousand
times since, but my reply really hasn’t changed in all these years. It is
obvious to me that my friend wasn’t questioning the big things, but strained
mightily at that which involved a fraction of a fraction of his resources. I
could have suggested my co-worker not stay so late at the office when he was tired and his potential
productivity was so low. I could have recommended he turn off the TV and spend
more time in physical activity with his family. But he didn’t ask me to
critique how he spent his time. He asked me how he could possibly connect to
his faith community when he was completely spent at the end of a long week.
“Don’t
go to church at the end of your week,” I suggested. “Go at the beginning of
your week instead. I bet the support, energy and inspiration you’ll gain will improve the six days that follow.”
Last
I knew, he and his family were still attending their church regularly.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
A Kick to the Liturgical Crotch
So I’m a few weeks into my Lenten fast. I have given up all
violent media this time. This is harder than you might think, even for a fairly
passive guy like me. Actually, I blew it on the first day.
Abbey of the Genesee |
On Ash Wednesday, the wife, the son and I rode over to the
Abbey of the Genesee, a Benedictine trappist monastery in Piffard, NY famous
for their breads. (http://www.geneseeabbey.org)We
bought lots of loaves (mmm, raisin bread…) and then slipped into the chapel for
vespers.
If you’ve never attended a session of the Liturgy of the
Hours, you should seriously consider it. It is peaceful, reflective, beautiful
and wonderfully restorative.
Well,
usually. On this fine afternoon, the chosen psalms for recitation included
139 (If only you would slay the wicked, O God)
and 140 (let the mischief that is on
their lips bury them. Let hot burning coals be poured upon them : let them be plunged into that miry pit from which
they shall never arise.). This was incredibly violent
stuff, even when chanted with placid monks in front of a minimalist stone altar. Check that - especially when chanted with placid monks in front of a minimalist stone altar. The effect was chilling! In a place of high Roman Catholic holiness on the very first day of Lent, I broke
my fast before I’d really even started. Oh, the irony.
As
it turns out, this experience was fair warning for what has followed. Violence
is so deeply woven into American culture that it is nearly impossible to avoid.
I lean over a pew before church to joke with a young congregant and he’s deeply
engaged in a light saber duel on his hand-held video game. I sit down to watch
the Daily Show and have to avert my eyes from a commercial for an automatic
bill pay service that features a malevolent, angry bill collector shattering
glass and breaking down doors to deliver an invoice. At a hotel in Binghamton last weekend I had to turn off the
cable tv because the commercials inserted into even the mildest of programs
featured a ton of violent content.
Last night at band practice I began to show the boys and
girl a rendition of Let It Be from one of my favorite movies (Across the
Universe), only to realize I’d have to shield my eyes through the first 1/3 of
the song.
Ridiculous? Yes, it is. The lengths to which we must go
to honor a somewhat arbitrary decision is part of the glory of a Lenten commitment.
It is maddening, imbalancing and terribly inconvenient --all things a good reflective faith challenge should be. These passing weeks help me realize how indifferent
or even accepting I have become toward
violence. I didn’t realize how ubiquitous it has been in my supposedly peaceful life.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Yesterday was Charles Darwin's 203rd birthday, and I'd say he's holding up well for a man who's been dead 130 years.
I am a proud member of a group called the Clergy Letter Project, started by Michael Zimmerman ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-zimmerman.) That means I take part in Evolution Weekend. Each year, on the Sunday closest to Darwin's birthday, I preach/teach about the compatibility of science and religion. It's an important message to deliver.
Yesterday, in a children's message, I urged the kids to recognize how much of their existence owed itself to scientific inquiry. I noted that the very building inwhich we worshipped was designed, built and maintained utilizing the sciences of geometry and physics. I removed a cover from an altar candle holder and talked about the ingenuity of the candle, and even showed them the ingenius spring-loaded mechanism that keeps each candle uniform in appearance and burn. We talked about the clothes on their backs and the thoughts in their heads. We praised the scientific method as a marvelous lens and tool for better understanding the universe and every little thing in it. Happy birthday, Charlie!
But lately I find that I am no longer addressing the chief front of anti-science rhetoric. Sure, there are still plenty of narrow-minded, misguided folks of faith who wear their intentional ignorance as some sort of proof of their piety. This is sad, and must be engaged. But I am finding more and more that faith and science actually share a more formidable opponent: profit.
This is a strange and imperfect point, since much of our current scientific inquiry serves commercial purposes, but here are a few examples of what I'm thinking:
Climate Science: The reality of global warming is undeniable. For a long time, it was popular with a certain crowd to deny this fact in the face of a tsunami of data. As that stance has crumbled, the more recent retreat position is to deny human causation. This has little to do with science and much to do with commerce. The fossile fuel and related industries are powerful and ubiquitous. They are central to our way of life. Reality is no longer a friend of ours.
Epidemiology: In conversation with one of the more informed folks I know, yesterday she mentioned a farm in Pennsylvania with three separate populations of cattle, each of which drank from a different water source. One population of cows experienced a 3000% increase in mortality rate (from two to 60 annual cow deaths) after hydrofracking operations had commenced near the stream from which they drank. The public never hears of these cases because financial settlements for damages include a blanket gag order. How can we possibly make informed decisions if evidence is thus suppressed? How many other paths of epidemiological inquiry are shut down or shut up to protect financial interests?
Education: It is now quite popular with a certain crowd to attack teachers and educational institutions. Ask yourself what motivates such attacks.
I have not yet fully formed this opinion. It is more of an inkling that I'd like to flesh out or throw out through dialogue with my peers. What do you think? Are there monied interests suppressing certain areas of scientific inquiry?
I am a proud member of a group called the Clergy Letter Project, started by Michael Zimmerman ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-zimmerman.) That means I take part in Evolution Weekend. Each year, on the Sunday closest to Darwin's birthday, I preach/teach about the compatibility of science and religion. It's an important message to deliver.
Yesterday, in a children's message, I urged the kids to recognize how much of their existence owed itself to scientific inquiry. I noted that the very building inwhich we worshipped was designed, built and maintained utilizing the sciences of geometry and physics. I removed a cover from an altar candle holder and talked about the ingenuity of the candle, and even showed them the ingenius spring-loaded mechanism that keeps each candle uniform in appearance and burn. We talked about the clothes on their backs and the thoughts in their heads. We praised the scientific method as a marvelous lens and tool for better understanding the universe and every little thing in it. Happy birthday, Charlie!
But lately I find that I am no longer addressing the chief front of anti-science rhetoric. Sure, there are still plenty of narrow-minded, misguided folks of faith who wear their intentional ignorance as some sort of proof of their piety. This is sad, and must be engaged. But I am finding more and more that faith and science actually share a more formidable opponent: profit.
This is a strange and imperfect point, since much of our current scientific inquiry serves commercial purposes, but here are a few examples of what I'm thinking:
Climate Science: The reality of global warming is undeniable. For a long time, it was popular with a certain crowd to deny this fact in the face of a tsunami of data. As that stance has crumbled, the more recent retreat position is to deny human causation. This has little to do with science and much to do with commerce. The fossile fuel and related industries are powerful and ubiquitous. They are central to our way of life. Reality is no longer a friend of ours.
Epidemiology: In conversation with one of the more informed folks I know, yesterday she mentioned a farm in Pennsylvania with three separate populations of cattle, each of which drank from a different water source. One population of cows experienced a 3000% increase in mortality rate (from two to 60 annual cow deaths) after hydrofracking operations had commenced near the stream from which they drank. The public never hears of these cases because financial settlements for damages include a blanket gag order. How can we possibly make informed decisions if evidence is thus suppressed? How many other paths of epidemiological inquiry are shut down or shut up to protect financial interests?
Education: It is now quite popular with a certain crowd to attack teachers and educational institutions. Ask yourself what motivates such attacks.
I have not yet fully formed this opinion. It is more of an inkling that I'd like to flesh out or throw out through dialogue with my peers. What do you think? Are there monied interests suppressing certain areas of scientific inquiry?
Monday, January 2, 2012
Creation
To One, a thought occurs:
Two.
What a lonely thought that must first be!
And, BANG, there’s
Light and Dark. One can work with that.
Next comes Matter and Doesn’t Matter. One can work with that,
too.
And One throws Matter into Doesn’t Matter, all willy-nilly
at first, but can’t fill it up. So One puts Matter here and there in ways that One don’t know…sort of makes sense.
In the process, One discovers Thin and Thick. One stretches
Matter from really Thick to Thick to Thin to really Thin in bits and pieces and various gradations throughout
Doesn’t Matter, and sets it all to spinning, circling, zooming and floating.
One gets really excited when certain bits of Matter seem to
catch on to what One is doing. One’s Creation
begins creating.
It isn’t much, at first. Just some particular little bits of
Matter seem to organize and replicate. Then some bits grow identical bits and
split. This starts to get more and more complex, until some Matter becomes
adept at finding other Matter a lot like themselves, and they combine tiny
pieces and nurture and grow new bits of Matter between them that are almost identical but
just a bit... more-so. Some Matter prefers places where the Matter is fairly thin,
some like to be in constant contact with thicker Matter, others float or swim
around where Matter is sort of in between. Much of it has an appetite for
innovation.
One sees Oneself in Two, and sits back and checks it all out.
What is wanting? What
is needed?
One can’t help Oneself, and reaches out and lightly touches
a bit of a more complex system of Matter. To One’s delight, it turns around.
I’m right here!
One says excitedly. Hello!
But instead of waving or smiling or otherwise engaging One, each of these little bits of complex Matter strain unsuccessfully to recognize what is
obviously still far beyond their grasp, and, inevitably, each turns to their companions and says “Did you hear that?” or “I think I almost caught a glimpse of something out of
the corner of my eye.” or “I don’t know, I just have this feeling, you know?”
One recognizes what is happening. Two sees itself as two! And all the separate pieces of Two are individually
wrapped up in dark-or-light, black-or-white, yes-or-no, right-or-wrong,
this-or-that; so much so that there is little or no sense of One or even oneness about Two or any of its pieces. Little bits occasionally come
close to recognizing One before wearing out or breaking or giving up. But the process is so
slow and terribly frustrating to watch. It is hard on One, learning that One
and Two inadvertently make at least three.
So One sits back, occasionally leaning in (Hey, I think I can talk to this piece of Two…).
A touch here and a great religion is born. A breath there and a marvelous
advancement is realized. One even tries slipping fully aware into a bit of
matter to show several little pieces of Two what it is all about, beating a
path back to One, but ends up nailed to a post and causing a lot of arguments. One
whispers into solitary ears on mountain tops, under trees, or in caves and
beautiful ideas are documented, filled with hints of One and profound truths,
causing a lot of arguments within the various pieces and parts of Two.
One has to admit to Oneself: Two is biological, binary and
bi-polar. There is nothing for it but for One to simply love Two as is, and wait for Two to get its
meds right and realize its oneness, before the whole of Two can recognize and become
one with One.
So One waits.
Anyway, there is something tugging at One that merits
attention. It is just a vague stirring, at first. But the idea grows to a
maddening whisper from some back corner beyond Matter-Doesn’t Matter; a
question in need of exploration. One can’t help but steal occasional glances
over One’s own shoulder.
Is there a ONE or MORE I don’t
recognize beyond Me, too?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)