When I was growing up, I didn’t always agree with my father
and his choices, but the sterling central pillar of his character that I have
always unfailingly admired, even at the youngest of ages, was and is his fierce, undying
love for my mother.
It is, at times, clumsily applied, in my opinion. But underneath the bluster and frustration, NOBODY
can honestly question my father’s powerful devotion to my mother.
I hope my children can say the same for me. I love Teresa so
widely, narrowly, top to bottom and inside and out that it has consumed me, refined
me and defined me. I can’t imagine
life without her. Something wild, weird, delightful or terrible happens to me?
It is she with whom I first want to share the story as soon as possible. Even
better are the adventures we experience together, which we can call up to each
other with little more than a glance across a crowded room. I delight in those
times when she speaks what was just on the tip of my tongue, or when we don’t
have to speak at all. She hurts, I hurt. She feels joy, I soar, too. She advises, I
weigh her words carefully (okay, usually I object and stonewall, and then crawl
off to my cave to somehow convert her
clear thinking to my idea, but you
all know what I mean). I am a better, more complete and more fully realized
human being for her inexplicable decision to spend her life with mine, side by side and arm in arm, officially, personally, publicly and faithfully united.
I wish everyone who longed for such a relationship could
have it. I look for that potential in every couple I counsel for marriage. What is your strength together? What is that
go-to default setting between you that no crisis can touch? Identify it. Nurture it. Celebrate it. Guard it with your LIVES!
This is what I find so heart-breaking about the current
marriage rights debate. Some would try to turn this whole Chik-fil-A tempest
into some battle for free speech. Somehow, Dan Cathy’s right to say as he
pleases is threatened by the millions who recoil from his pronouncements and actions, and from the corporation he owns and the product he sells
to fund his political efforts?
Wait. Please.
One side in this battle is fighting for the right of
individuals to find and strive to fully live in the joy I have described above with the legal recognition of the state, and the full blessing and support of their faith communities.
The other side is trying to permanently legislate the state-enforced denial of
that pursuit of happiness for an entire sub-group of Americans, including
stepping between this pastor and members of his flock.
Being a citizen of “the land of the free and the home of the
brave” comes with certain responsibilities. Chief among them is to trust that
others can make their own way in the world without you or me forcing complete
personal public and private adherence to the particulars of our own world view. If what you want
for your life does not injure others, I have no grounds for preventing you
pursuing it, even if I find it repulsive or at odds with my morality.
If you or I object to gay marriage, we should neither
enter into one nor attend a church that performs such ceremonies. I don’t cry
foul to any of my friends, colleagues or relatives who disagree with gay marriage as long as they leave it at that. What
we should not do is
endeavor to influence elected officials to shut down another's equal protection and reasonable rights.
This is America, for God’s sake.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. -- The Establishment and Free Exercise clauses of the Constitution of the United States
Nicely put, Bro, and that's a beautiful picture of you and my lovely (in so many ways) sister-in-law, taken on one of my favorite days of my life.
ReplyDeleteOur constitutionally-established right to speak freely does not come with constitutionally-established protections against any repurcussions from its exercise. Just because you CAN speak freely, doesn't mean you always SHOULD. Highly publicized espousing of one's beliefs should carry a reasonable expectation of highly publicized reactions. (See: "Read my lips- NO NEW TAXES!" and "I did not have sexual relations with that woman.")
I'm glad that you prefaced your comments with such a beautiful description of the spiritual nature of a healthy marriage. When marriage equality or "gay marriage" is discussed, the spirituality of marital love is left out. The unspoken rhinocerous in the room is the sexual attributes of marital love. From this, I believe, the objections to marriage equality generally, but genuinely, arise.
And the sexual attributes of marital love, I strongly stress, are private and intimate and should not be discussed outside one's own marriage or about any other's marriage. It is impolite, unseemly, unbecoming, bad form... need I go on?
So, in a nutshell, if it's none of our business, let's keep it that way. What does it matter to me if any two people of any gender combination want to wed? If they have the love that you and I have experienced and shared in our marriages, to deny any two souls the joy and depth of commitment would feel like a sin.
Corey....well spoken as always. You have framed the argument correctly...this is not about free speech but rather about trying to legislate one's own religious views into law.
ReplyDeleteCorey, everything you said here confirms why Shawn and I chose for you to marry us. We share the same kind of connection you describe, and I truly believe if you are blessed enough to find it once in your life - grab it, hold on, nurture it and never let go. What other choose for their life is their business - for mine I have chosen complete and utter happiness with my best friend. Who could begrudge anyone that?
ReplyDeleteGod certainly blessed you and Shawn with each other, Denise. It was an honor to be a part of the public sealing of your vows. Thanks for your comments.
ReplyDelete