Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Sermon from Sunday, October 12, 2008 on Becoming an Open And Affirming Church

Fundamentals, Not Fundamentalism

I have fielded a lot of requests for transcripts or recordings of this past Sunday's sermon. Mike, our fearless High-Tech leader, is out of town for a few weeks, so there will be some delay in the posting of the podcast of the sermon (eventually available, as are most of my sermons, at http://wbccucc.blogspot.com). So, in the interim, here is an ever-so slightly cleaned up transcript of the sermon.

It begins with three readings from the Revised Common Lectionary for the day:

Exodus 32:1-14 When the people saw that Moses delayed to come down from the mountain, the people gathered around Aaron, and said to him, "Come, make gods for us, who shall go before us; as for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him."
Aaron said to them, "Take off the gold rings that are on the ears of your wives, your sons, and your daughters, and bring them to me."
So all the people took off the gold rings from their ears, and brought them to Aaron. He took the gold from them, formed it in a mold, and cast an image of a calf; and they said, "These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt!"
When Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it; and Aaron made proclamation and said, "Tomorrow shall be a festival to the LORD."
They rose early the next day, and offered burnt offerings and brought sacrifices of well-being; and the people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to revel.
The LORD said to Moses, "Go down at once! Your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have acted perversely;
they have been quick to turn aside from the way that I commanded them; they have cast for themselves an image of a calf, and have worshiped it and sacrificed to it, and said, 'These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt!'"
The LORD said to Moses, "I have seen this people, how stiff-necked they are.
Now let me alone, so that my wrath may burn hot against them and I may consume them; and of you I will make a great nation."
But Moses implored the LORD his God, and said, "O LORD, why does your wrath burn hot against your people, whom you brought out of the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand?
Why should the Egyptians say, 'It was with evil intent that he brought them out to kill them in the mountains, and to consume them from the face of the earth'? Turn from your fierce wrath; change your mind and do not bring disaster on your people.
Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, your servants, how you swore to them by your own self, saying to them, 'I will multiply your descendants like the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have promised I will give to your descendants, and they shall inherit it forever.'"
And the LORD changed his mind about the disaster that he planned to bring on his people.


Philippians 4:1-9 Therefore, my brothers and sisters, whom I love and long for, my joy and crown, stand firm in the Lord in this way, my beloved.
I urge Euodia and I urge Syntyche to be of the same mind in the Lord. Yes, and I ask you also, my loyal companion, help these women, for they have struggled beside me in the work of the gospel, together with Clement and the rest of my co-workers, whose names are in the book of life.
Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, Rejoice. Let your gentleness be known to everyone. The Lord is near. Do not worry about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.
Finally, beloved, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasing, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence and if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things. Keep on doing the things that you have learned and received and heard and seen in me, and the God of peace will be with you.


Matthew 22:1-10 Once more Jesus spoke to them in parables, saying:
"The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who gave a wedding banquet for his son. He sent his slaves to call those who had been invited to the wedding banquet, but they would not come. Again he sent other slaves, saying, 'Tell those who have been invited: Look, I have prepared my dinner, my oxen and my fat calves have been slaughtered, and everything is ready; come to the wedding banquet.'
But they made light of it and went away, one to his farm, another to his business, while the rest seized his slaves, mistreated them, and killed them. The king was enraged. He sent his troops, destroyed those murderers, and burned their city.

Then he said to his slaves, 'The wedding is ready, but those invited were not worthy. Go therefore into the main streets, and invite everyone you find to the wedding banquet.' Those slaves went out into the streets and gathered all whom they found, both good and bad; so the wedding hall was filled with guests.
"But when the king came in to see the guests, he noticed a man there who was not wearing a wedding robe, and he said to him, 'Friend, how did you get in here without a wedding robe?' And he was speechless. Then the king said to the attendants, 'Bind him hand and foot, and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.' For many are called, but few are chosen."


Our sermon this morning is Fundamentals, Not Fundamentalism. Our readings this morning are all pretty fundamental. In our Gospel reading you heard a story of an invitation that went out in this parable from Jesus. The invitation went out to everybody who was already a part of the faith community...all who were the Chosen People – all who were Jewish – to come to this banquet. And the banquet was Christ. And many, during his life, refused to come. So he said “open it up to everybody.” And they did open it up to everybody, and many came, and there was much rejoicing.

Then we get to this confounding part in Christ's story where someone who was just pulled off the streets was there at this wedding banquet, and he's chastised for not wearing a celebratory wedding robe. And it sounds unfair, as most folks aren't walking down the street wearing a wedding robe. But remember, this is a parable. You have to treat it like the story it is. You have to dig a little deeper.

What are we really talking about? We're talking about someone who was invited into a faith that wasn't really theirs to begin with. Much like just about anyone Christian. We didn't start out Jewish. We were grafted onto this tree with this God. This parable speaks to anyone who was invited into this faith, accepted the invitation, came in and enjoyed the blessings, but who didn't change in any noticeable way: Came right in and kept right on with the same attitudes and prejudices they'd always had... came into the feast of Jesus Christ and showed no external evidence at all that they had embraced anything life-changing at all. And Jesus tells this fable as if to say: “those people who refuse to redress their crimes or correct their misconceptions – the ones who won't make the least little change to show gratitude for this free gift they are given – are not going to be a part of this banquet.”

-------

In the Epistle reading from Philippians, Paul is heartbroken because two of the women with whom he started up that church – two who rolled up their sleeves and labored side by side with him – were having some kind of argument that was splitting the church. And so he appealed to the others of this faith community: “help these women get along.” He doesn't address the exact issue and say this one's right, this one's wrong. He is not searching for some empirical truth that will shut one of them up. Instead, he says: “find a way to help them put this behind them, end the conflict and recognize any disagreement as petty compared to the greater task of serving Christ.”

So we've talked so far about two fundamental points of a healthy Christian faith:
1.not carrying in your own prejudices and fears when you enter this new life, and
2.not using your faith as a source of conflict and strife.


And then we have that reading from Exodus, which is as fundamental as it comes for our faith. THE GOLDEN CALF.

Now most of us have a Cecil B. DeMille image of that calf...with some woman sensually polishing it with her long, dark hair, while all the loin-clothed, movie lot extras dance and grind around her in a state of debauched arousal. We also naturally equate gold with money. No. No. No.

What is the problem with an idol? Simply this: It is an attempt by finite beings to contain the eternal in a nice, manageable package. Put God in a little, portable box, and stick God wherever you want to. You can move God over here. Don't like the view over here? Move God over there. And you can manipulate God anyway that serves you, shape God into any form that is agreeable to you. THAT is the sin of the golden calf.
Now we Christians don't have any idol like that nowadays, right? We don't have anything that we use to try to put God in our box, right? Nothing we use to say “God agrees with me and God is shaped like this,” right?

Hmmm.

Nothing in Christianity is turned into more of a self-serving idol than this book on the pulpit. We use our Bibles to spread more hate, more division and more oppression than any shiny cow statue could ever bring around. The Bible is our false idol.

- - - - -

Once, long before I went into the ministry, I had a conversation with a gentleman in South Carolina who knew me as a Yankee, but not necessarily as a Christian. And he told me that he was almost kicked out of his church. He was the deacon in charge of scheduling weddings, and he was nearly drummed out of his church for giving a couple permission to marry there. The couple was black, and it says right here in the Bible “each to their own kind.” Black people shouldn't get married in a white church! It says right here in the Bible! THUMP!!

- - - - -

One of my favorite authors is Dr. Eugene Petersen, who wrote a modern translation of the Bible called The Message. And he also wrote a few books for pastors that really strengthen clergy and give them cause for joy, hope and strength. He was raised by a single mom, a beautiful lady and Christian.

His mother was a missionary to the rough and tumble logging camps of the Northwest. Eugene and his mother would travel from remote camp to remote camp by sled, and she would sing and preach and lift up these men so far from home and civilization. She did this for years, and then suddenly it stopped, and she traveled no more to preach and teach.

It wasn't until years later that Dr. Petersen asked his mother why she stopped. And she told him of a group of men confronting her outside a camp meeting, opening their Bibles and reading “women, be silent in the church,” and “it is not right for women to instruct men.” And how many lumberjacks...how many men far from everything they knew and loved, didn't hear the Gospel because a group of self-righteous prigs lifted up their idol and went THUMP!!!

- - - - -

How about a brand new Anglican bishop who, as he goes through his glorious installation, has to wear a bullet-proof vest under his beautiful vestments because there have been so many death threats from his fellow Christians? Gifted pastor or not, he's gay, and “it's an abomination,” THUMP!!!

This, my friends, is our golden calf. This beautiful, sacred series of writings that has so much in it about love, joy and how to be a living, loving child of God; and how to live and celebrate and share all the blessings that are ours; this, my friends, is what we use to put God in a box that we can control. This is what we use to dress up our same old prejudices and fears. This is what we use to come into the pews and not change a thing about ourselves. If we read this book and it doesn't scare us, rip out our hearts and challenge our prejudices and pre-conceived notions, then we aren't reading it deeply enough. If it doesn't give us the occasional headache, then it is nothing more than another lousy golden calf.

Now there are people in this very community who need God, love and a place where they can come and hear what is pure, honest, true and hopeful. And the reason they are not here is what we have done with and to this Bible. We are better than this.

You right now are sitting on a hill in a church that in 1834 – when the only support they had in this wilderness was the Presbyterian church – severed ties with that, their only lifeline to civilization back east because the Presbyterians refused to take a vocal stand against slavery.

You are sitting in a church that in 1893 – 26 years before women had the right to vote, and at a time when women were supposed to be silent in the church – hired it's first female pastor.

You are sitting in a church that, at the height of the race riots of the 1960s, traveled en masse into downtown Rochester to worship at an urban, African-American church, and then invited that same church out here to worship in these very pews with us.

This is our church. This is our scripture. These are not blunt instruments. The fundamentals of our faith are that we love our God with all our heart, soul, mind and strength; and that we love our neighbor as ourselves.

“And who is our neighbor?” as the devout, uber-religious man asked Jesus. Jesus answered that man in a parable in which he lifted up the most detestable of people to the Jew: a Samaritan. Who is your neighbor? The one you detest the most right now. The one you are most prejudiced against, uncomfortable around, fearful of right now is the one Christ points out as the person to love and accept. That is the one who should be here with us now.

Let's take off our prejudices. Let's not cast our prejudices, fears and short-sightedness on God. Let's love our neighbor. That is FUNDAMENTAL.

Now FUNDAMENTALISM is different. It is what we are trying to avoid. Fundamentalism is someone's interpretation of scripture that is only 150 years old. Our scripture is 2000-3000 years old. That OLD TIME RELIGION is NEW. It was a response to something called the ENLIGHTENMENT, when common people finally had their scriptures in a language they could read and began to apply their God-given reason and logic to Biblical thought, just as scholars, rabbis, prophets and priests had done for thousands of years. They had the power to read and discern and influence their own destiny. And some took it even further and said “wait, we can use these same principals to govern ourselves,” and our nation was born. And yet, there are those who would shut us down, using this same Word and saying, “No, it is not your reason. That is not our TRUTH!” And they claim “this is not what the Bible says,” as if the Bible had a mouth and vocal cords and as if what they were doing to it was anything but a bad ventriloquism act supporting their own prejudices.

Let us, my friends, not put words in the Bible's mouth, but, rather, faithful, prayerfully dig deep into all that is written here. With awe, and trembling, let's recognize who and whose we are, and, especially, WHO WE WILL WELCOME regardless of sexual orientation, economic status, race, gender or any other thing that we cynically, faithlessly use to bicker with our brothers and sisters.
That's FUNDAMENTALS as opposed to fundamentalism.

12 comments:

  1. Wish I had been there to hear this in person. Very powerful, very true.
    Hope we can all go on this journey together as a church family.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Instead of embracing Christ consciousness,humanity will do anything,believe anything in order to cling to the consciousness of separation. Thank-you for a great sermon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great sermon Corey. I can't wait to hear it through your voice on iTunes!

    I hear so many people use the Bible to get their negative points through about people and things. Nice to see you use it trying to get a positive idea through and to try to unite people. You have a great congregation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think you are manipulating God's words. From your line of thinking, when stealing and lying or adultry become common place and more acceptable, then we should embrace that behavior? I believe in "love the sinner, hate the sin". The Bible is very clear, and we need to follow it even when it is not easy to do. I do not promote negativity, I hope to show people the love of Christ, through example, show them that they too can be saved by His sacrifice. Jesus loves all of us, and we all face temptation and challenges. The Bible is not an idol for me, it is Gods word, that should be studied and followed. Is abortion acceptable too? Do you think that it is okay to kill an unborn child and not call it murder, because times have changed, society has changed, because society accepts it as norm?
    I appreciate what you are trying to do, but wonder where the line is drawn, and at what point God's word becomes just a story book to you.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My dear friend, I believe I know who you are and it saddens me that you feel the need to remain anonymous. I understand, though, given the rancor often present in this sort of discussion.

    I would ask you to choose your words more carefully. I am not "manipulating God's words." I am reading the Bible and interpreting it. You are doing the same. The only way we can derive anything of value from the written word is to read it or have someone read it to us, then interpret it or have someone interpret it for us. It is no sin to use our own minds and community of believers to discern meaning in scripture. Indeed, God demands it! It is no sin for me to disagree with you and your instructors.

    You have studied long and hard with others who showed you ways to encounter scripture and embrace its truths. I have studied long and hard with others who showed me ways to encounter scripture and embrace its truths. Different people. Different truths.

    Do you hold a mortgage on your home? Have you ever held a car loan? The Bible clearly prohibits either activity. Have you ever eaten a shrimp cocktail? The Bible clearly states you have committed an abomination. Why are you not "hating the sin" of munching a really good prawn or paying a banker for the roof over my head?

    But what was meant by an abomination...either towebah or piggool in the Hebrew? It meant that which was disgusting to the tribe or violated tribal custom...it was described as an abomination for the Egyptians to eat with the Hebrews (Gen 43:32), an abomination to the Egyptians to be a shepherd (Gen. 46:34), Hebrew-style religious sacrifices were an abomination to the Egyptians (Gen. 8:26), it was an abomination to eat sacrifice left-overs after two days (Lev 7:18), an abomination to eat shrimp or lobster, and certain insects, birds or animals (Lev. 11:10-42), an abomination to recycle the silver or gold that adorned destroyed idols (Deut. 7:25-26), and an abomination to research and possibly adapt any worship technique from another faith (Deut.12:31). Abomination does not necessarily mean what is suggested by some of our more modern interpreters with their particular axes to grind. It really meant something that violated tribal sensibilities. Tribal sensibilities change, as can be seen in the disciples embrace of gentiles and acceptance of their customs which had been considered prohibited by scripture and tradition for a thousand years.

    As to Romans 1, what do we do if it turns out that Paul was wrong when he said homosexuality is "unnatural." (Though in Paul's day there was no separation of natural/unnatural worlds. The Greek term is phusikos - physical, from the primitive verb phuo, which probably meant to germinate - does that mean that any sexual activity that does not carry the possibility of procreation is sinful? Will post-menopausal women burn in hell for having sex with their husbands? Will newly married couples burn in hell for using contraception?) But beyond that, if Paul really argues that homosexuality is sinful because it is "unnatural," but homosexuality occurs naturally throughout creation, could that mean that Paul's argument is baseless, and homosexuality is not accursed, but created by the Lord?

    Our sexuality is a sacred gift hard-wired into our systems. To tell someone - based solely on your interpretation of scripture - that they cannot be the complete human being God made them to be is to risk great harm to that individual. Families are destroyed every day by "love the sinner, hate the sin" or even worse attitudes. Every five hours a gay or lesbian teen commits suicide, in part due to the alienation created by this attitude.

    The Gospel saves lives. We've both seen that. Please don't hold back this church from saving lives. If you are who I think you are, then I know and believe you when you say you appreciate what I am trying to do. You and I have been through much together, and I have seen God work through you in amazing ways. So I ask you to please do the following:

    1-Don't introduce other controversies into this conversation. I can't think of a more illogical linking of issues than homosexuality and abortion!

    2-Don't play the game of exaggerating my stance to what you see as its logical conclusion. I am not the one professing an all-or-nothing interpretation of scripture, so there is nothing logical in your claim that my acceptance of homosexuality will somehow lead me to acceptance of murder. Sure, it's a slippery slope, but all of life is a slippery slope.

    3-Don't give up on me or this faith community. Your voice is important to us. Your presence and continued friendship are important to me, personally.

    To all other posters on this particular thread, I ask that you deal respectfully with all others in this dialogue. I know for some of you this has truly been a life-and-death issue and the scars run deep; but please, be loving and patient as we ask others to be the same!

    Now then, let's keep talking and interpreting! Who's next?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm sorry, but you have me confused with someone else, I have not met you personally or ever been to your church. I discovered your sermons and was interested in some of your previous thoughts.
    Not enought time right now to respond in more detail. Until later...

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is Claudette. I'm searching for a religion, though I am very familiar with Christianity. I'm under anonymous because I don't have a blogger identity yet.

    I really appreciated your sermon, and I think that this has been a great discussion so far.

    In response to Anonymous,I respect where you are coming from. I also know that some of those issues are very controversial, but I just wanted to point out...if one truly "loves the sinner",shouldn't one be forgiving? I'm not saying that I expect anyone to embrace anything they feel is wrong. I am saying that I hope that we (all of humanity) will let go of the "us verses them" morality mentality (I know I'm guilty of it...and unecessary alliteration). We all sin.

    Jesus died to make the world a better place for us, no matter who we are or what we've done, so I believe we should follow his example and love unconditionally.

    Someone I know and respect often says "the people who are hardest to love are the people who need to be loved the most".

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fascinating discussion. I agree that we must never get caught in the trap of thinking that OUR interpretations match GOD's interpretations ... we were made in God's likeness and image, not the other way around.

    In Isaiah 56 we read: "My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are My ways your ways. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, So are My ways higher than your ways and My thoughts than your thoughts."

    Take note, that Divine chastisement isn't directed only to scriptural neophytes -- it's for every one of us, even those who spend hours immersed in studying the Word.

    That same scripture addresses how God will gather all those "who love the name of the Lord" to give them an eternal home and an everlasting name. God mentions specifically that righteous 'foreigners and eunichs'(read: unknown and unholy) will be welcomed because God's house "will be a house of prayer for all people."

    Our job is not to define someone else's 'righteousness' but to pay very close attention to our own. I am on dangerous ground if I start hand-selecting the sins that God should condemn (Anybody have a pack of Post-it Notes from work in their home? Spread a rumor about a neighbor? Burn a CD for a friend? Hold a mortgage or car loan? Exaggerate?) Just because I don't sin in ONE particular way doesn't mean I'm without sin. And it surely doesn't give me the right to start advising other sinners on their abominations.

    Open hearts, open minds, a willingness to live the questions ... that is why I LOVE THIS CHURCH! Let's keep talking -- pass the blog link on to others.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Great comments, all. Thanks, Teresa, for introducing Isaiah's beautiful, prophetic voice into our conversation. (We love that book so much, we named our son for it's author!) Thank you, Claudette, for joining in with your firm, gentle convictions. And I apologize, anonymous, for mistaking you for someone else. I am delighted you took the time to enter this conversation. You are, of course, welcomed with open arms into this dialogue.

    I feel the need to clarify the reason for the sermon I preached last Sunday and published here. The leadership team and church council of WBCC UCC each voted at my request to pursue Open and Affirming status. Unpacked, that simply means we will have a dialogue in our church toward a vote by the full membership to welcome into our faith community and into our pulpit any qualified individual regardless of sexual orientation. The leadership team insists that what we are really doing is adding sexual orientation to the list of traits and categories we already explicitly welcome without prejudice. Or, better said, we will create a statement that makes explicit what for our leadership team is already implicit: We do not discriminate on the basis of race, gender, physical handicap, economic status, nationality or sexual orientation.

    Doing this requires something challenging in this day and age: We must decide that homosexuality is not a sin, and that a loving, monogamous homosexual relationship between consenting adults is not sinful. Much of the debate will come down to how we choose to interact with and interpret scripture. It is a simple but challenging prospect, as Biblical interpretation is foundational to our faith.

    In my sermon I mentioned three pieces of local church history:

    * Our church stood up against the forces of forced enslavement of human beings at great personal risk to our congregation at a time when many Christians and entire denominations were reluctant to do so out of fear of alienating large numbers of our brothers and sisters in Christ.

    * Our church hired our first female pastor in the 1890s, recognizing Rev. Annis F. Eastman as annointed by God to lead us, and braving no small amount of ridicule and rejection by area communities and local Christians.

    * Our 99.9% white church stepped into the middle of the Civil Rights movement at a time when it was quite easy to fear the black race and remain isolated from "the city's problems" here, some 30 miles from downtown. To do so, we had to pull some of our members to a place they may have preferred not to go, and to acknowledge the humanity and Christian decency of people that many voices urged us to distrust.

    I was born and raised in this very congregation, and I am fully confident that I am continuing the tradition taught to me, and am fulfilling my mission as a called and ordained pastor of West Bloomfield Congregational Church. This is the church we have always been. This is the tradition we are endeavoring to uphold.

    There are fine Christians out there in the world and some in our own pews who will disagree with me. That is their prerogative, and it is important for us to hear them out. But at the end of the day, I must tell you, that it is my deeply held conviction that homosexuality is neither unnatural nor sinful as an impulse or in a loving, monogamous relationship of mutual consent.

    Here I stand. I can do no other.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Love you, bro. Great sermon. You know where I stand on these issues- quite close to you as in most things.

    Not meaning to pick on "Anonymous", the terminology in Anon's statement, "The Bible is very clear, and we need to follow it even when it is not easy to do" caught my attention. Following the Bible is a very popular way to pursue a Christian faith. I would point out that following Christ is probably more accurate to His intentions. By following Christ, I mean to follow his example. After all, Christ's mortal life ended many many years before the Bible was assembled from some of the existing scriptures of the time. "Following the Bible" is boxing Jesus (boxing=confining, not pugilism).

    The Bible is a convenient package and a good manual for the operation of a Christian Being. The manual is not the thing itself. Some of us have a difficult time remembering that.

    "Lead with Love". In my opinion, that is one of the fundamentals of following Christ, of imitating Jesus' example. For my own personal relationship with God, that is how I define being a Christian- following the example of Jesus- the spirit of the "Law" over the letter of It.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well said, Brother. In fact, it was a whole group of people (a large percentage of the Pharisees)focused exclusively on following the letter of the law who missed the Messiah entirely the first time 'round.

    I really love Giovanna's statement on this... characterizing the embrace and practice of a healthy, soul-building faith as "Christ consciousness." That really works on so many levels for me!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Fascinating stuff. I am enjoying learning how those that are NOT open to homosexuality think. I don't agree with them, but am learning alot! I hope this dialogue goes on and on!

    It is also interesting to see everyone interpretting the Bible to make their points!

    ReplyDelete